Our position

Communities set the terms

Standard donor frameworks often begin with a predetermined problem and a fixed solution. We start elsewhere: development is legitimate only when people living in a place define its priorities and judge its results.

Locally shaped change tends to outlast external programmes because it is rooted in relationships, knowledge and decisions that communities already hold. That is the resilience we examine and argue for.

Foundations

Three analytical commitments

Local self-determination

Priorities, evidence and success are set by the communities concerned, not assumed in advance by external actors.

Institutional accountability

We ask who holds power, who answers for outcomes, and whether those affected can hold institutions to account.

Structural critique

Political analysis examines the structures that shape poverty and civil society space, rather than treating symptoms alone.